xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] CDATA

Re: [xml-dev] CDATA

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] CDATA
From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:33:42 +1000
References: <001c01c2f829$e666ce80$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <3E89EE1D.4010608@prescod.net> <16009.62133.595965.452818@megginson.com> <3E89FBF7.5060708@prescod.net> <20030401220135.GF23221@panix.com>

From: "Adam Turoff" <ziggy@panix.com>

> > >Or just scrap the whole thing.
> 
> I agree.

Another point for removing CDATA marked sections is that
many people expect "CDATA" really means "NDATA",
to allow them to stick in binary fragments (which may cause 
transcoding problems).

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e better off as a crossing guard
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
- CDATA
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- re: [xml-dev] CDATA
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] CDATA
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] CDATA
  - From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@panix.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] E4X
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] E4X
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] CDATA
Next by thread: RE: CDATA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread