Lists Home |
Date Index |
Dan Vint <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> At 08:46 AM 4/24/2003 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> >2) The W3C XML Schema WG was convinced that the needs of document
> >authors to state their claims of document type and the needs of
> >applications to protect themselves could not _both_ be satisfied by
> >any form of _required_ connection between documents and schemas, so we
> >made _all_ such connections hints.
> So rather than looking at something like XML/SGL catalogs as a
> mechanism to appease both or make it manageable
How does moving the information out of the document make it any less
of a contradiction to _require_ that an author's intentions are
respected, while at the same time _allowing_ an application to use the
schema it must?
I think you're over-reacting to the word 'hint' and not looking
carefully enough at what the REC says about xsi:schemaLocation -- see
my immediately preceding message.
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: email@example.com
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]