[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Arg, bitten once again. Yes, this was meant for public consumption...
Peter Hunsberger
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 6:39 PM
> To: Hunsberger, Peter
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] (data) medium is the message
>
>
> This is cool - did you mean to send it to the list?
>
>
> Peter.Hunsberger@stjude.org (Hunsberger, Peter) writes:
>
> >Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com> writes:
> >
> >> Peter.Hunsberger@stjude.org (Hunsberger, Peter) writes:
> >> >Although I can understand this vision and even buy into
> some of it I
> >> >wonder how close it is?
> >>
> >> It's not close. The vast majority of people are going down
> >> the "we need prior agreement on all semantics" path. I
> >> translate that as "we need information totalitarianism", but
> >> it's painfully common.
> >
> >We're more at "we need some agreement on the use case" stage
> of things.
> >Sure, when arguing use cases one does end up arguing
> semantics but only
> >to make sure you're all actually working on the same use
> case. Again,
> >I'm not
> >a huge fan of UML and less so of RUP but I do like having a use case
> >hanging
> >around for everyone to aim at.
> >
> ><snip/>
> >
> >> >From the metadata we generate schema. What we don't do
> is arrive at
> >> >these business rules by bouncing data around until we get it
> >> right and
> >> >frankly I don't see how we could.
> >>
> >> "Bouncing data around" is, of course, how business rules
> >> emerged in the human world. When I was a sales assistant, if
> >> I got a fax I didn't understand, I took it to my boss or to
> >> the warehouse or whoever I needed to talk with about how to
> >> handle it, and learned from that experience.
> >
> >And if the business was big your boss probably handed you a SOP
> >manual...
> >
> ><big snip/>
> >>
> >> And I've argued for years that secretaries know more about
> >> office information than anyone in the company, so I'm
> >> obviously coming from a different perspective. I've actually
> >> done this myself, building a database that did most of my
> >> job's menial tasks with minimal intervention, so I know it's
> >> quite possible, but the social milieu isn't there at present.
> >>
> >> >Maybe Joe user can do top down
> >> >development, but that means stepping back and
> understanding the big
> >> >picture and that's not something that everyone can do. So I
> >> think for
> >> >the next couple of years there's still going to be a need
> >> for Frank the
> >> >IT guy, or at least Frank the consultant who helps you build some
> >> >schema.
> >>
> >> For a long time, sure. But it's time to start exercising
> >> some imagination and asking what else we can do. Trading
> >> pre-defined data is boring, to put it mildly,
> >
> >Having business processes in place that work might be boring
> but that's
> >what's needed for the most part?
> >
> >> and top-down
> >> development requires trusting the top. I don't trust the
> >> perspective that people at the top or looking from the
> >> top of a problem seem to share; I never have.
> >
> >Well if the secretaries are the ones with the knowledge
> that's who you
> >talk
> >to get your business rules... Let me be clear, when I say
> we document
> >business rules I don't mean the developers. I mean the business
> >analysts
> >(who wouldn't know a DTD from a XSD at the best of times)
> and the end
> >users
> >(who might know how to use Excel and maybe Brio). The analysts are
> also
> >the
> >people who create and review the metadata. The developers tweak the
> >metadata to make it consumable by our applications, but that's more
> >because the current state of the art (the mapping tools)
> then anything
> >else...
> >
> >> Frank the IT guy's job is safe. I'd just like to develop
> >> systems that include people beyond Frank the IT guy, people
> >> who may not know a lot about XSLT or C, but do know about the
> >> actual subject matter they're working with.
> >
> >Absolutely, that's why I say the end user needs Frank the IT
> guys help
> >to
> >create the schema, not the other way around...
> >
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
> Errors, errors, all fall down!
> http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
>
|
