[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
From: "Arjun Ray" <aray@nyct.net>
> "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote:
>
> | The vast majority of people are going down the "we need prior agreement
> | on all semantics" path.
>
> I assume there is an emphasis on the word "all", else I can't imagine a
> practicable system for any kind of information exchange among independent
> parties.
As well as being used for half-way or neutral format, XML is also used as a facade
for existing systems: in that kind of case it is not so much a question of
"lets agree on what X means!" as much as "I want X, can I glean it from
your Y or Z?" IYSWIM
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
|
