xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] rfc 1738

RE: [xml-dev] rfc 1738

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>, "'Bob Foster'" <bob@xmlbuddy.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] rfc 1738
From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 17:55:28 +0100
In-reply-to: <003101c31081$a4c9f3b0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
References: <1b2c01c3100d$bd87f8d0$1401a8c0@snobird>

At 09:05 02/05/2003 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:

>The RFCs on URI syntax are notoriously woolly, but the new java.net.URI
>class in JDK 1.4 makes a serious attempt to implement them correctly.
>And it decides that the file
>
>\\machine\share\dir\file.xml
>
>is addressible using the URI
>
>file:////machine/share/dir/file.xml

Thanks Michael. One more to add to the test grouping!
   4 slashes now!!!

  Larry/Tim/Roy? Listening :-)
2396 beckons!
  Why must it be so confusing?

regards DaveP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] rfc 1738
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] rfc 1738
  - From: "Bob Foster" <bob@xmlbuddy.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] rfc 1738
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] (data) medium is the message
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] (data) medium is the message
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] rfc 1738
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] rfc 1738
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread