[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 14:02 12/05/2003 -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>For simple datatypes, there's only one game in town. And that limits our
>choices somewhat...and beyond that, our *requirements* force us to support
>these datatypes. They also force us to support documents that do not
>contain them, including merely-well-formed and DTD-governed documents.
Perhaps W3C, or at least this WG, got the requirements right first time?
I've only ever seen one set of requirements that didn't change over time,
and I wrote those after I'd delivered the software, for ISO9000 sake.
Are they really cast in stone?
regards DaveP
|
