xml-dev - DAML +OIL versus XML

DAML +OIL versus XML

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: DAML +OIL versus XML
From: "Mohamed Fayez" <mfayez@mail.ucf.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:34:58 -0400

Hi All,

Can "DAML +OIL" replace "XML"?

Cheers,
MF

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
  - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
- Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
  - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] What are the characteristics of a good type system for XML?
Next by Date: re: [xml-dev] Why XML?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Why XML?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS