xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML

Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:48:43 +0100 (BST)
Cc:
In-reply-to: <sec40827.063@mail.ucf.edu>
Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>Can "DAML +OIL" replace "XML"?

I dunno.  How do you do

 <html>
  <h1>My web page</h1>
  <p>Here are some photos of my family</p>
 </html>

in "DAML + OIL"?

-- Richard

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
  - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>

References:
- DAML +OIL versus XML
  - From: "Mohamed Fayez" <mfayez@mail.ucf.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Why XML?
Previous by thread: DAML +OIL versus XML
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] DAML +OIL versus XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS