[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
tbray@textuality.com (Tim Bray) writes:
>For publishing-oriented apps of XML, we're nowhere near being able to
>do away with entities, and the state of the art for handling them is
>not very advanced.
I've chosen entities mostly because there's a tremendous amount of
possibility here - lowest entry cost (now that I've written a parser,
anyway, though I think libxml might provide similar access), greatest
possibility for making my own work life simple.
I suspect that a lot of the challenges around entities have to do with
the question of what constitutes an advance. It seems like a case where
coming up with a sample processor is a better way to gauge people's
opinions than discussion, so I'll see what I can come up with.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
