[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 11:22 AM 6/10/2003 -0700, Erik Bruchez wrote:
>
>This being said, XPath 2.0 is mostly backward-compatible with 1.0, so
>I don't see how the nature of the language is changed.
And in particular, it is mostly backward-compatible in its handling of
untyped data.
Jonathan
|