xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>,xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:25:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <3EE621F4.2080606@bruchez.org>
References: <1055265753.2208.22.camel@ibook><3EE4D7B1.85D735A9@mitre.org><5.2.0.9.2.20030610170510.00af5aa0@pop3.Nildram.co.uk><3EE611ED.1010200@bruchez.org><1055265753.2208.22.camel@ibook>

At 11:22 AM 6/10/2003 -0700, Erik Bruchez wrote:
>
>This being said, XPath 2.0 is mostly backward-compatible with 1.0, so
>I don't see how the nature of the language is changed.

And in particular, it is mostly backward-compatible in its handling of 
untyped data.

Jonathan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
  - From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread