[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) scripsit:
> I don't think a mapping to a "canonical UOM" is needed, unless you
> intend to use it as a standard route to "infer" missing formulas. Anyway:
Easy for you to say: you live in a rational SI world, and don't have
to deal with the Fred Flintstone Memorial Measurement System (name
tm Markus Kuhn, IIRC) and its close cousin the Former Imperial Glory
Measurement System.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
Big as a house, much bigger than a house, it looked to [Sam], a grey-clad
moving hill. Fear and wonder, maybe, enlarged him in the hobbit's eyes,
but the Mumak of Harad was indeed a beast of vast bulk, and the like of him
does not walk now in Middle-earth; his kin that live still in latter days are
but memories of his girth and his majesty. --"Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit"
|
