[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Maybe the world needs an "xml-utterly-practical" list? You're hardly
> the first person I've heard with this complaint. I doubt I'd join it,
> but that would probably make the utterly-practical folks cheer anyway.
Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone? There are
other lists for individual things like xsl, java+xml etc. I suspect a
literal "xml-dev" would be too widely scoped. This list on the other hand
has the groove left by those six years of posts to keep it on track...
> It's a technology, it's a medium, it's interesting. As technologies go,
> this one has a lot of depth, and not just because the specs have grown
> enormous.
Yup.
Cheers,
Danny.
|
