xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline no

Re: [xml-dev] xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline no

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
From: "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:12:31 -0500
References: <BKELLDAGKABIOCHDFDBPOEEGDHAA.danny666@virgilio.it>

> Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone?

In case anyone doesn't know, there is an xml-technology specific newsgroup:
comp.text.xml. It seems of real use to people who are, e.g., having trouble
using XML Schema or DTDs, and the "Is XML a bagel or a database?" kind of
question  usually draws a constructive response.

Bob Foster

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>

References:
- xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
  - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] political blather (WAS Re: Advice: inline node edit ing, or not?)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] No Divine Right to a Reply (Was: Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] xml-utterly-practical (was RE: [xml-dev] Advice: inline node editing, or not?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread