[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> > > Maybe the world needs an "xml-utterly-practical" list? You're hardly
> > > the first person I've heard with this complaint. I doubt
> I'd join it,
> > > but that would probably make the utterly-practical folks
> cheer anyway.
> >
> >Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone?
> There are
> >other lists for individual things like xsl, java+xml etc. I suspect a
> >literal "xml-dev" would be too widely scoped. This list on the other hand
> >has the groove left by those six years of posts to keep it on track...
> >
>
> I can't honestly believe that, in lieu of just trying to 'maintain'
> topicness on this list, tone things down on the politics/business
> discussion a bit, and get back to the xml technical/development side
> of things, the creation of *another* list is being recommended.
That's the exact opposite of what I was saying, and doesn't particularly
follow from Simon's points either.
> Sheesh. If that doesn't highlight the problems with some of the
> personalities and mindsets behind the XML front, I dunno what does
> ... I've never met a bigger bunch of techno-beaureaucrats! Well,
> maybe in the Tandem days ...
Your technical/development point being?
Cheers,
Danny.
|
