[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> > Maybe the world needs an "xml-utterly-practical" list? You're hardly
> > the first person I've heard with this complaint. I doubt I'd join it,
> > but that would probably make the utterly-practical folks cheer anyway.
>
>Would an xml-technology specific list be any real use to anyone? There are
>other lists for individual things like xsl, java+xml etc. I suspect a
>literal "xml-dev" would be too widely scoped. This list on the other hand
>has the groove left by those six years of posts to keep it on track...
>
I can't honestly believe that, in lieu of just trying to 'maintain'
topicness on this list, tone things down on the politics/business
discussion a bit, and get back to the xml technical/development side
of things, the creation of *another* list is being recommended.
Sheesh. If that doesn't highlight the problems with some of the
personalities and mindsets behind the XML front, I dunno what does
... I've never met a bigger bunch of techno-beaureaucrats! Well,
maybe in the Tandem days ...
--
;
Jay Vaughan
r&d>>music:technology:synthesizers - www.access-music.de/
*
|
