[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
chiusano_joseph@bah.com (Chiusano Joseph) writes:
><Quote> I still haven't really seen XML/filesystem connections
>implemented, but I hope it's just a matter of time. </Quote>
>
>Simon, you may want to check out OASIS' Directory Services Markup
>Language (DSML[1]), if you haven't already.
I think you missed the point of the thread completely. "Representing
directory structural information as an XML document" isn't what
interests me or what we were discussing. Treating XML documents as if
they were extensions of filesystems is what interests me.
See, for (ancient) example:
http://simonstl.com/articles/filesyst.htm
>"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
>>
>> jtauber@jtauber.com (James Tauber) writes:
>> >Some of the ideas remind me of my "Plan X" idea that I mentioned a
>> >couple of times on xml-dev back in 1999:
>> >
>> >http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/199902/msg00332.html
>> >http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/199902/msg00419.html
>> >http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/199903/msg01090.html
>>
>> Good to see you again, James!
>>
>> I also wrote something about this way back when:
>> http://simonstl.com/articles/filesyst.htm
>>
|
