[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
chiusano_joseph@bah.com (Chiusano Joseph) writes:
><Quote>
>I think you missed the point of the thread completely.
></Quote>
>
>I'm sorry, I don't recall referencing the "point of the thread" in my
>response (and I have not actually had a chance to read your article).
>My intention was simply to reference an emerging open standard that
>incorporates XML and directories/filesystems, in the event that it may
>have provided an additional angle to your viewpoint.
I think you would be well-served to read the materials referenced by
threads before promoting yet another specification of only tangential
value.
If you want to "reference an emerging open standard", that's fine. Just
don't do it in the guise of being helpful when you can't be bothered to
read the context. It feels to me like working the room, not like making
a contribution.
Starting new threads is probably a good idea in general here anyway.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
