[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Linda Grimaldi wrote:
>
> If the RDF in my earlier email is used at the ontology level, can I not
create an instance as follows:
> <ClassA rdf:ID="thisClass">
> <hasMapping rdf:resource="#thatClass">
> <mappingClass rdf:resource="#mappingClassInstance1"/>
> </hasMapping>
> </ClassA>
That's not legal RDF/XML. The object of the "hasMapping" property can either
be indicated by rdf:resource= OR by an inline (striped) node. Doing both is
a syntax error.
>
> Thus, at the instance level, the mappingClass has different values for
different thatClass/thisClass pairs, and the transitivity property applies
to all <hasMapping> properties?
???
I am not sure what you are trying to do. Perhaps this?
<owl:Class rdf:ID="ClassA">
<hasMapping>
<Map>
<toClass rdf:resource="ClassB" />
<mappingClass>org.example.MapperA_B"</mappingClass>
</Map>
</hasMapping>
</owl:Class>
Jonathan
|
