[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
[Linda Grimaldi]
> Doesn't a restriction apply to all members of a class? What I am
> looking for will vary in value by instance, not by class. And since
> instances will be added all the time, I can't subclass and lump
> together.
>
Yes - I thought that by using owl:allValuesFrom, you could restrict the
hasMappingClass to include only those transitive properties (or whatever)
you talked about. I assumed that those properties would have a class of
their own, which would be the object of owl:allValuesFrom.
> Ah, for true ternary relations :>).
>
Ah, for Topic Maps... :-)
Cheers,
Tom P
|