xml-dev - Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question

Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:08:13 -0400
References: <2484616.1059507018114.JavaMail.nobody@thecount.psp.pas.earthlink.net> <006301c3562f$f33b3060$6401a8c0@tbp1> <008201c35644$c2886770$b6f5d3ce@svhs.local>

[Jonathan Borden]
>
> The difference in functionality between an owl:Restriction and an
rdfs:range
> is that an rdfs:range applies globably to a property, whereas a
restriction
> is local to the class being defined.
>

Yes, that is what I thought Linda was trying to express - since she was
treating a property as a class to be restricted - but maybe that notion was
not quite what she had in mind.

Cheers,

Tom P

Follow-Ups:
- RE: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
  - From: "Linda Grimaldi" <grimlinda@earthlink.net>

References:
- Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
  - From: Linda Grimaldi <grimlinda@earthlink.net>
- Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
Next by Date: tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiple module DTD
Previous by thread: Re: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
Next by thread: RE: RE: [xml-dev] OWL-ish question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread