[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Thomas B. Passin" wrote:
>
> ...
>
> More to the point, the pruning will probably need to take some more human
> input along the way, which sounds like several passes to me. I am not sure
> how far the person involved wants to go in paring down the schema. I
> suspect he wants to be fairly draconian about it.
>
upon examination, i reminded myself that cl-xml already serializes the dtd
through a recursive walk over the type model, as this is necessary in order to
emit sensible namespace declarations. thus,
changing it to accomplish the simple form of this was a matter of disabling
its second pass over the document definition which would normally ensure that
un-referenced types appear in the document type definition.
that exercise made the trick part of the question apparent: what kinds of
transformations are intended for the content models? a reduction to that which
appears in the document, replacement of unreferenced types with ANY?
...
|
