Lists Home |
Date Index |
Good to see Dennis using Piccolo as well as Xerces. The tests confirm
still one of the worst-performing XML parsers* (though, of course,
It would be useful to also have a test of scalability: what the rates
are for multiple
concurrent parsers, with pooling. Or do you think the results should scale?
Christian Nentwich wrote:
>this is really cool, finally some hard data. One thing that would make
>your presentation even more convincing is if you dumped the property
>and feature values set in Xerces at the time of running into your
>This would help to convince the reader that you didn't overlook
>anything, e.g. leave some kind of whitespace normalisation turned on,
>didn't leave any schema validation turned on, etc.