OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Good to see Dennis using Piccolo as well as Xerces. The tests confirm 
that Xerces-J
still one of the worst-performing XML parsers*  (though, of course,
things change). 

It would be useful to also have a test of scalability: what the rates 
are for multiple
concurrent parsers, with pooling.  Or do you think the results should scale?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

* http://piccolo.sourceforge.net/bench.html
http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/~aslom/exxp/
http://archive.devx.com/xml/articles/sf020101/sf0201-3.asp
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2002/jw-0426-xmljava3-p2.html
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=34&thread=338038&message=1386505


Christian Nentwich wrote:

>this is really cool, finally some hard data. One thing that would make
>your presentation even more convincing is if you dumped the property
>and feature values set in Xerces at the time of running into your
>experiment information.
>(http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/properties.html)
>
>This would help to convince the reader that you didn't overlook
>anything, e.g. leave some kind of whitespace normalisation turned on,
>didn't leave any schema validation turned on, etc.
>
>Christian
>  
>






 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS