[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 7:16 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Managing Innovation
>
> SELinux is neat, but it's not a requirement, and doesn't
> invalidate the fact that the basic Unix security model is
> good.
So what are you comparing the basic Unix security model to when you say
it is good?
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
The only way to be popular is to listen to a lot of stuff that you
already know.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
