[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 07:40, David Megginson wrote:
> Rick Marshall writes:
>
> > that's what ibm said 20 years ago and every design since has had to
> > cope with 640k base memory ranges and other "that'll be more than
> > enough" decisions.
>
> I understand that argument well, but in this case, we're not talking
> about limiting the overall length of XML documents. Let's try not to
> imagine only the present, but the future as well -- can anyone make a
> reasonable case for an XML element or attribute name longer than 4096
> characters (for example)?
do you mean like once computer generated namespaces and random names get
involved? i can see it happening within a few years.
rick
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
> David
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
