[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Danny Ayers wrote:
> An alternative is to turn it around and apply a "certainty factor" to the
> statement using reification:
>
> {dog memberOf pets} certainty .9
>
> But like you say, it's still pretty awkward.
>
Yes, I decided to stay away from reified statements on purpose, because
of the questions about how they relate to other actual triples in the
RDF store.. But in addition, I am not so sure that assigning a number
to the reified statement actually captures the semantics of a fuzzy
membership. I think the number really applies to the predicate, as best
I can make out. Is that equivalent to talking about the entire
statement? Maybe, but it is not clear to me yet.
Cheers,
Tom P
|
