[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:43:46AM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> [Dare Obasanjo] I haven't reviewed the minutes yet but it seems
> contradctory to state that more research is needed before specifications
> can be created then go ahead and recommend a working group.
The recommendation from the Workshop was that a WG be chartered to
produce test data, collect use cases and identify requirements.
However, creating of a Working Group within the W3C is subject to
a vote of the Advisory Committee -- every member gets a vote.
> Personally I think this is unsettling but will withold further comment
> until I've had a chance to read the minutes and all the position papers.
Something to consider is that the Working Group, if formed, could
produce a conclusion that W3Cshould not specify a binary format for
interchange of XML.
Liam
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
|
