xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML

Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
From: Oleg Dulin <dulino@olegdulin.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:36:04 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <B2D824D4-0F31-11D8-A01C-000A95CCC59E@xegesis.org>
References: <000601c3a33b$36662e50$c801a8c0@DIDIERHOME> <B2D824D4-0F31-11D8-A01C-000A95CCC59E@xegesis.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

>> what is the wheel that will be replaced? What XML rendering language 
>> is to
>> be replaced by XAML.
>>
> XForms for conventional data input, SVG for vector graphics, XML+CSS for 
> rendering, XHTML+DOM for dynamic "browser" pages?

That is precisely the problem.

An MS developer using XAML only needs to learn XAML. Everyone else needs 
to learn 20 different XML languages.

Oleg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
  - From: Pascal Tran-Ngoc-Bich <pascaltnb@wanadoo.fr>
- RE: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
  - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
  - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
  - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ASN.1 is an XML Schema Language (Fix those lists!)and Binary XML not needed...
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Why I Like Longhorn and XAML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread