[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes:
> Henry S. Thompson scripsit:
>
>> Without being
>> specific in a way which would be inappropriate given my W3C position,
>> I would say that my experience over the last six months is a
>> significant decrease in interop problems among the three or four best
>> schema processors.
>
> I don't think it would be inappropriate for you to mention which
> three or four you have in mind, in a posting with an appropriate
> disclaimer, and noting that silence does not mean disapprobation.
Well, I'll say that I have seen very few examples in the last six
months where XSV, SQC and Xerces don't agree, and most of those arise
because of areas of the REC which XSV has never implemented.
I definitely would not want this comment to be understood as a
positive or negative assessment of any other product.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
