xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE:Microso

Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE:Microso

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE:Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
From: Michael Leventhal <hanagid@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:37:38 -0800
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D5174E@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Reply-to: michael@textscience.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr-FR; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0

I wrote an article in this November's XML Journal which, I beleive, 
accurately describes the debate in the W3C Workshop and also categorizes 
all binary formats presented in position papers according to their main 
algorithms and intended objectives. I think this article should be very 
helpful to many trying to understand this discussion.
See http://www.sys-con.com/xml/article.cfm?id=745

Michael Leventhal

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for Patents
Next by Date: RE: Parsing XML with special characters (Perl XML::Parser)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread