xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?

Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
From: David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:02:43 +0400 (AMT)

> > Yes, I have been to fast to answer... The only think we could object is
> > that it would have been better named "URIreference" !
> 
> Actually, the anyURI type also allows non-ASCII characters, so it is
> really the IRI type, but IRIs were not yet defined or even named at
> that point.

Is there a regular expression or BNF grammar for anyURI?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call forParticipation
Previous by thread: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread