[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: 'Joe English' <jenglish@flightlab.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Expertise and Innovation - was Re: [xml-dev] Non-Borg servers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:55:37 -0600
That's it as I remember. When it was mentioned prior to that,
it was considered trivial. People forget that prior to
the opening up of the Internet to commercial use, it wasn't
a candidate for global hypermedia. The fact of a
free distribution on a network capable of distributing
immediately and without regard to borders to people without
funds (students, researchers, etc.) did the rest. It
wasn't a good technology but it was ripe. Tim got the
brass ring so he deserves the applause. I don't consider
getting it to work across the Internet to be trivial.
Anytime I start to believe the hype about the web as the
most important invention of..., or how it is fundamentally
changing society or enabling real democracy, I read the
statistics on the top ten search items of the year and
the research on power-law distributions. "Same as it
ever was."
So do we have to refer to Tim as STimBL now? Seems rather
Tolkienesque.
len
From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@flightlab.com]
Michael Kay wrote:
> My first reaction was quite different but equally wrong. I thought he
> was totally naive to imagine that he could get the world to agree on one
> standard for doing this stuff. I still don't know how he succeeded in
> grabbing mindshare. Most good ideas fall on stony ground, why didn't
> this one?
My best guess: it wasn't Tim B-L who got everyone to agree,
it was NCSA. Mosaic was a sufficiently compelling improvement
over the various gopher clients then in use that everyone
switched over. The "standard format" was largely ignored;
people didn't create documents for "The Web", they created
them for Mosaic.
|