[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 00:04, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> Ok, for the moment (until we get some consensus on whether to either
> keep the same namespace for RDDL, or to use another) I've placed the
> new spec at
>
> http://www.rddl.org/rddl2
>
> *but* left the namespace the same in that document.
Thanks!
I think that we either need a separate namespace or to describe both
RDDL 1.0 and RDDL 2.0 in the RDDL directory for RDDL (or at least to
provide a link to RDDL 1.0).
Eric
--
Lisez-moi sur XMLfr.
http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
- Santa Clara -half day- (15/03/2004) http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
