xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up

Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@jeffrafter.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:36:29 -0800
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
References: <0494A708-49EF-11D8-B62D-000A95BA5A2C@openhealth.org> <1074458181.24853.364.camel@delleric> <8CDD5CB2-4A08-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@openhealth.org> <p06010206bc31a291caf6@[192.168.254.4]> <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>

On Jan 19, 2004, at 8:34 AM, Jeff Rafter wrote:

> Does anyone know the current deployment/penetration level of RDDL?

JeanPa tells me that they're going to be (maybe already are) using it 
for the Microsoft Office XML namespace names (those that aren't (grr) 
URNs that is).  -Tim

References:
- RDDL(2): new version up
  - From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
  - From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
  - From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@jeffrafter.com>

Prev by Date: RDDL2 background
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML Training
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RDDL(2): new version up
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread