Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version

[Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>]

Eric,

> On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 18:13, Andreas Sewe wrote:
>>> Not really: I meant a copyright purpose rather than version :-( .
>>
>> Wouldn't "license" be a better name serving the same purpose? To me
>> "copyright" sounds more restrictive than "license" - and more
>> restrictive than necessary as well.
>
> Yes, you're right, licence is more general than copyright.

I'll add it to the "well known" list of RDDL purposes. I assume there 
isn't a similar Dublin Core property that could be used instead?

Jonathan