xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone

Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec
From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:42:16 +0100
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <403DFB5F.DECB00E8@bah.com>
References: <20040226111707.60740.qmail@web40810.mail.yahoo.com> <403DDA42.8040607@expway.fr> <403DFB5F.DECB00E8@bah.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> Did you really mean XBL? [1] It never advanced past the W3C Note stage,
> and that was 3 years ago.

It doesn't change my question regarding the advantage of standardising a 
binding technology of standardising a UI vocabulary that will 
necessarily be limited. Especiallly as there's nothing keeping XBL from 
evolving in the future.

-- 
Robin Berjon

References:
- A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XUL Spec
  - From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@yahoo.ca>
- Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec
  - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXULSpec
Next by thread: What's wrong with a XBL, SVG-RCC, XForms combo?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread