Re: [xml-dev] Media Types, Purposes, Natures, and XSL Transforms

[Eric Hanson <eric@aquameta.com>]

Jonathan Borden (jonathan@openhealth.org) wrote:
> Well RDF isn't human readable and it does describe resources, and 
> splinter specs such as RDFS and OWL allow you to specify vocabularies 
> in ways that actual software can process. Of course it's probably more 
> complicated that what you want, but so is the English language... and 
> just like the English language it is being used ... actually if we use 
> this analogy, RDF is more like ... say Belgian, but nonetheless it does 
> have a population :-)

Sounds good, using OWL might be the way to go.  So...what's the
ontology of a resource that supports XML data?  That one will
take some figuring.

Thanks,
Eric