[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Jonathan Borden wrote:
> I suppose that if you are simply looking to use nature and purpose you
> can simply use rddl:nature and rddl:purpose as a simple vocabulary.
> Indeed take a look at RDDL2: http://www.rddl.org/rddl2
> Eric Hanson wrote:
>> I like RDDL as a starting place, but maybe what I'd like to see
>> is some kind of sister spec for non-human-readable RDDL.
Speaking of RDDL2: What was the reason for abandoning XLink?
I'm curious because the first thing that came to my mind when reading about
Typekit was that it's basically - in XLink terms - an extended, third-party
linkbase.
Regards,
Andreas Sewe
|
