xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-d ev] Yo

RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-d ev] Yo

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Rich Salz' <rsalz@datapower.com>, Ken North <kennorth@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 13:59:44 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org

Not pixie dust: traceable process.  How secure are systems without it?

len


From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]

It seems that in Len's view, ISO is magic standard pixie dust sprinkled on
after a private consortium decides the basic technology.  They don't,
historically, invent, they just word-smith.  It might be important
word-smithing, but isn't that really all it is?

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: [xml-dev] You call that a standard?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread