Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:37:38PM -0400, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> Mark Baker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:10:57AM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> > > A simple question, but one that could get to
> > > the heart of whether or not we should expect
> > > to see growth in the semantic web business:
> > >
> > > What are some services that SemWeb
> > > applications could expose for discovery
> > > and integration into web client applications
> > > including mobile applications?
> > Do you mean Semantic "Web Services", or "Semantic Web" services? The
> > former, IMO, is best ignored, because it's tied to Web services/SOA
> > which I don't consider workable for Internet scale integration.
> Please elaborate in detail.
Missed the REST debates did we? 8-)
I won't get into detail here - check the Web Services Architecture WG
mailing list archives for that - but I'll just say that Web services
exist because many people were under the impression that the Web
couldn't be used to solve machine-to-machine integration problems.
They were mistaken. Where that leaves us now is essentially with two
competing architectural styles. The distinction I tried to make above
reflects those two styles.
Followups on that to firstname.lastname@example.org please.
To Len; RDF in UDDI is a Good Thing, given that UDDI is being used, and
those using it could benefit from RDF. However, I would have preferred
that UDDI never existed in the first place and that HTTP and http URIs
were used instead, ala;
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca