[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Ken North wrote,
> Miles Sabin wrote:
> > Your general point here is well taken ... however, in this case
> > we're discussing a deliberately Java-specific API.
>
> XQJ is an API for Java programs, but that doesn't mean the format of
> the data going across the wire has to be Java-centric.
Did anyone say it did?
Cheers,
Miles
|