xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
From: Micah Dubinko <micah@dubinko.info>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:17:27 -0700
Cc: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <4197459d.583804135@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@lnxdayexch06b.lexis-nexis.com> <20041021193255.GE32505@w3.org> <4197459d.583804135@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913)

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>I do not think embedding RDF in web pages makes sense, otherwise it
>would be very odd for the W3C to have a rdf-as-xhtml task force...
>  
>
I for one would like to see more web pages with embedded rdf-as-xhtml.

.micah

-- 
  Available for consulting. XForms, web forms, information overload.
  Micah Dubinko                           mailto:micah@dubinko.info
  Brain Attic, L.L.C.                        http://brainattic.info
  Yahoo IM: mdubinko
  Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread