xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:06:11 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=RRnFLX6XpwHPAkEMqyL+Y55c+5KfhWDopj5Mlex0RwcjXazGJmABdTwCCSVibHzO2rWV8TvyvHH1ZdqebvDQRxhBYwsOqin69om3Duqm/oOr4n55yL4DH6fkuJNE4gtLtGL803KavD0x27qriwdRmkAw8oVAmYVHLS+IO6nRG6A=
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1038BE183@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1038BE183@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Reply-to: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:27:56 -0700, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com> wrote:

> True. A lot of the complaints at the XML DevCon Mike Champion references
> are more from XML tool builders than from XML users. 

Yup.  Users can ignore the cruft, just voting with their feet against
stuff that causes more pain than gain.  Tool builders don't have the
option, unless they want to be labelled non-conformant.  That's pretty
much a kiss of death in a competitive market.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Can a CDSect be split across entity boundaraies?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread