Lists Home |
Date Index |
Joe English wrote:
> When I complain about namespaces, it's just the opposite:
> I *don't* want to have to use URI/localname pairs everywhere.
> I'd rather treat element type names and attribute names
> as simple, atomic strings. This is possible with a sane API,
> but most XML APIs aren't sane.
Interesting. What would such a sane API look like? Are you envisioning
something more along the lines of XPath/XQuery/XSLT where the program
has its own list of namespace bindings that it uses to transparently
resolve qualified names? Or are you thinking more of something like
DOM1/SAX1 that pretty much ignores namespace bindings?
Elliotte Rusty Harold email@example.com
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!