xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:00:43 -0400
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <e3a5cb2c0410261854749cbffd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206889@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <417EEF54.6040004@propylon.com> <e3a5cb2c0410261854749cbffd@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

Michael Champion wrote:

uch like YAML or RNC is likely to be the ordinary-mortal
> readable/writable serialization.  

Maybe I'm weird, but I find RNG to be easier to read and follow than 
RNC. It's certainly easier to write.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
  - From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Partyin' like it's 1999
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread