xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?

Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Jeff Rafter <lists@jeffrafter.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:46:43 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <41A270F4.3080807@jeffrafter.com>

> > 2. Can you think of other differences that would occur if XML Schemas
> >    were used by a canonicalizer rather than DTDs?

Schema makes no guarantees about being round-trippable.  Going from
lexical space, to value space, and back, might do "bad" things (from a
c14n viewpoint).
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
  - From: Jeff Rafter <lists@jeffrafter.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] binary xml for large collections of structured data?
Next by Date: [ADMIN] (was Re: binary XML API and scientific use cases [Re: [xml-dev][ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread