[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
david.lyon@computergrid.net wrote:
>>The XML file was 840MB, the CSV 34MB -- a 2,500% difference
>>Compressed, the XML file was 2.5MB, the CSV 0.00015MB (150KB) -- a 1,670%
>>difference.
> Put another way, the compressed xml file was 2.5MB and the
> CSV file was 34MB.
>
> Therefore, sending compressed XML data is more efficient
> than using CSV and requires less resources to transmit
> and send.
Put another way, the compressed xml file was 2.5MB and the compressed
CSV file was 150KB.
Therefore, sending compressed CSV is more efficient than sending
compressed XML and requires fewer resources to transmit and send.
Bob Foster
|
