[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 20:59 +0000, Kevin Jones wrote:
> On Monday 27 December 2004 20:00, Daniela Florescu wrote:
> >
> I am personally starting to think there is a very real hole
> between standard OM based XPath and the top end all singing
> and dancing XML processing solutions. One that perhaps a
> re-factored XPath 1.0 would fit in much better than
> anything else I can think of.
Heh. Here's my opinion about all singing and dancing XML processing
solutions:
http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7620
Please, let's leave such prefabricated excess to the graven grey
corporate. Dedicated, professional craftsmen of code need much more
nuance and diversity on their tools.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Use CSS to display XML - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/x-dw-x-xmlcss-i.html
Full XML Indexes with Gnosis - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/12/08/py-xml.html
Be humble, not imperial (in design) - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=10286
UBL 1.0 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think28.html
Use Universal Feed Parser to tame RSS - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipufp.html
Default and error handling in XSLT lookup tables - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tiplook.html
A survey of XML standards - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-stand4/
The State of Python-XML in 2004 - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/10/13/py-xml.html
|
