Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 20:59 +0000, Kevin Jones wrote:
> On Monday 27 December 2004 20:00, Daniela Florescu wrote:
> I am personally starting to think there is a very real hole
> between standard OM based XPath and the top end all singing
> and dancing XML processing solutions. One that perhaps a
> re-factored XPath 1.0 would fit in much better than
> anything else I can think of.
Heh. Here's my opinion about all singing and dancing XML processing
Please, let's leave such prefabricated excess to the graven grey
corporate. Dedicated, professional craftsmen of code need much more
nuance and diversity on their tools.
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Use CSS to display XML - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/x-dw-x-xmlcss-i.html
Full XML Indexes with Gnosis - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/12/08/py-xml.html
Be humble, not imperial (in design) - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=10286
UBL 1.0 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think28.html
Use Universal Feed Parser to tame RSS - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipufp.html
Default and error handling in XSLT lookup tables - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tiplook.html
A survey of XML standards - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-stand4/
The State of Python-XML in 2004 - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/10/13/py-xml.html