OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] An unclear point with W3C XML 1.0 Specification

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Hi Harold,

Using a name pool imho kills the inherent readability
of xml.

When a binary compression technique is applied to xml
such as gzip, this usually happens automatically.

In any case the main advantages of including type
information are not size, but rather parsing speed
and system reliability.

I need to take a break now... If somebody wants to
propose a speed challenge for me, I'll be only too
happy to indulge....

(can I bring out my processing grid?)

Quoting Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@engrm.com>:

> * david.lyon@computergrid.net <david.lyon@computergrid.net> [2005-01-06
> 08:37]:
>
> > Hi Harold,
>
> > > > In XML 1.0, we have a larger file with no type information
> > > > and in the computergrid format, we have type information as
> > > > well as a saving of around 35% or 2,680,000 bytes.
>
> > > It's smaller, though somehow I doubt that's important....
>
> > Well, it can be important in a business context. People in
> > business don't have unlimited time. If a pricelist or any
> > document takes too long to load up... they'll simply
> > give the ctrl-alt-delete and give up. They have no love
> > for the computers, I can assure you.
>
>     Let's /pretend/ that there's a desire to compress the XML for
>     transmission, and that a conventional compression algorithm is
>     too, uh, expenisve, or something.
>
>     Can't the savings David seeks be obtained by using a name pool
>     for the tags? You know, as they go by, assign them a number, and
>     put the number and XML name in a map? Assuming that the XML
>     document is not some degenate with an indefinate tag vocabulary,
>     this would probably make his document even smaller, using XML.
>
>     If I've said something blasphimous, tell me. I'm not trying to
>     make this thread worse.
>
>     Why I ask, is that, I see David designing this new syntax to
>     eliminate a few tag names and attributes, and I don't see why
>     one would care about the length of the name of a /symbol/.
>
> --
> Alan Gutierrez - alan@engrm.com
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>




----------------------------------------------------------------




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS