Lists Home |
Date Index |
"Michael Kay" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> You gloss is not accurate. The REC also says, wrt the semantics of
>> <import> ,
> We had a discussion on this on xmlschema-dev in October and I thought the
> conclusion was that 3.15.3 was indeed flawed.
> If document A includes document B (or if C includes A and B), the components
> defined in A are never added to the "appropriate property of the schema
> which corresponds to the document B", and under 3.15.3 they are therefore
> not available to discharge QName references in B.
Sorry, I was confused by the context, which was Paul Spencer's
You're right, the impact of need for laziness has not always made it
to ever corner of the spec. that it needs to -- we're working on
getting composition right in XML Schema 1.1.
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: email@example.com
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]