xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing

Re: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Andrew Jeavons <apj@andrewjeavons.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing
From: David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:02:19 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <6.2.0.14.2.20050304132443.03fdea20@mail.andrewjeavons.com>
References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050304124119.048582a0@mail.andrewjeavons.com> <E1D7HMw-000894-00@ukmail1.eechost.net> <6.2.0.14.2.20050304132443.03fdea20@mail.andrewjeavons.com>
Reply-to: d_a_carver@yahoo.com
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)


> It is doing checks that can't be easily described in the schema, which 
> is what worries me...
>
If you have business logic checks that have to be done, then you might 
look at a combination of W3C Schema/RelaxNG and Schematron.  Schematron 
would handle the business validation, and the W3C Schema or RelaxNG can 
handle the Element attribute requirements.

Just a suggestion.



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.6 - Release Date: 3/1/2005

References:
- Schema, BNF and parsing
  - From: Andrew Jeavons <apj@andrewjeavons.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing
  - From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing
  - From: Andrew Jeavons <apj@andrewjeavons.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Schema, BNF and parsing
Next by thread: Semantic Technology Projects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread